Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models

Overview

A research paper that empirically characterizes how the test loss of neural language models scales as a power law with model size, dataset size, and compute budget. It provides quantitative formulas that allow practitioners to predict optimal resource allocation before training.

Best for

Best for
Researchers and engineers planning resource allocation for training large neural language models

Use cases

• Determining the optimal model size and dataset size for a given compute budget
• Estimating the performance gains from scaling up models or data
• Guiding hardware and training strategy decisions for large language models

Notes

A research paper that empirically characterizes how the test loss of neural language models scales as a power law with model size, dataset size, and compute budget. It provides quantitative formulas that allow practitioners to predict optimal resource allocation before training.

Use cases

• Determining the optimal model size and dataset size for a given compute budget
• Estimating the performance gains from scaling up models or data
• Guiding hardware and training strategy decisions for large language models

Pros

• Provides clear, empirically grounded formulas for resource planning
• Widely validated and influential in the LLM community
• Helps avoid wasted compute by identifying over- or under-training

Cons

• Empirical laws may not hold for novel architectures or training methods
• Assumes ideal training conditions not always achievable in practice
• Does not address qualitative aspects like safety or reasoning capabilities

Indexed from awesome-llm and enriched against its public facts.