Our verdict
We have not reviewed Gpt Runner yet
No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.
From the listing
About Gpt Runner
An open-source tool that lets users have conversational interactions with their local files using AI, alongside managing and executing custom AI presets. Built with TypeScript and maintained by the community.
Best for
Developers who want a local, scriptable way to chat with files and experiment with AI presets.
Use cases
- Chat with your local documents and files using natural language
- Manage, organize, and run multiple AI preset configurations
- Automate file-based workflows by chaining custom presets
Notes
382 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2023-09-11. Licensed MIT.
Pros
- Open-source with transparent code and community contributions
- Lightweight TypeScript codebase easy to fork and modify
- No vendor lock-in for preset definitions and file handling
Cons
- Relatively small community (382 stars) may limit available plugins and support
- Requires manual setup of API keys and local environment
- Preset functionality may lack advanced features compared to commercial tools
Key facts
What we have checked
- Days since the last commit
- 1,141
- GitHub forks
- 46
- GitHub stars
- 383
- Days to a first reply on issues
- 2.5
- Open issues
- 10
- Releases in the last 90 days
- 0
Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.
Health and security
Is Gpt Runner looked after, and what do its setup files show
Health score
44 out of 100
| Part | Points | What we saw |
|---|---|---|
| Recent activity | 0 of 30 | Last push 1,141 days ago |
| Releases | 0 of 15 | 0 releases in 90 days |
| Issue replies | 20 of 20 | First reply in 2.5 days (median) |
| Maintainer | 15 of 15 | Owned by an organisation |
| Official source | Not counted | MCP servers only |
Alternatives
Alternatives to Gpt Runner
| Record | Type | How we know | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| codeautopilotAlternative to this | Agent | Named in the listing | Not dated |
| CodyAlternative to this | Agent | Named in the listing | Not dated |
| gptengineerAlternative to this | Agent | Named in the listing | Not dated |
| marketplaceAlternative to this | Agent | Named in the listing | Not dated |
| Replit AgentAlternative to this | Agent | Named in the listing | Not dated |
| Anything LLMThis is an alternative to it | Open source | Named in the listing | Not dated |
| Private GPTThis is an alternative to it | Open source | Named in the listing | Not dated |
Compare
Compare Gpt Runner side by side
Sources
Where this comes from
- GitHubRegistry
A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.
Changelog
What changed
No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.
Open-source & AI alternatives
Swap-in tools that solve the same job. Weigh the trade-offs before you commit.
codeautopilot
Community
Codeautopilot is a community-driven autonomous agent for coding tasks.
Cody
Community
Cody the coding ai assistant
gptengineer
Community
gptengineer is a community-driven tool hosted on GitHub that uses language models to generate code from natural language descriptions.
marketplace
Community
Extension for Visual Studio Code - An open-source AI debugging agent
Replit Agent
Replit
Prompt to deployed app. Replit Agent scaffolds, runs, and hosts the thing without leaving the browser.
Pairs with
Other entries in the index that connect to this one. Click through to see the chain.
Get the free Developer’s Field Guide
A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.
Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.