Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Agents

Suspicion-Agent

The implementation of "Suspicion-Agent: Playing Imperfect Information Games with Theory of Mind Aware GPT-4"

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed Suspicion-Agent yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About Suspicion-Agent

Suspicion-Agent is a Python implementation of a research paper that uses theory of mind reasoning with GPT-4 to play imperfect information games. It models other players' beliefs and intentions to make strategic decisions in games like Avalon.

Best for

Researchers and developers exploring theory of mind reasoning in multi-agent game settings

Use cases

  • Building game agents that reason about opponents' hidden knowledge
  • Testing theory of mind capabilities in large language models
  • Researching multi-agent strategic interaction with incomplete information

Notes

165 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2023-11-08.

Pros

  • Implements a novel theory of mind approach for imperfect information games
  • Leverages GPT-4's reasoning for strategic decision making
  • Open source with 165 GitHub stars and active community interest

Cons

  • Requires GPT-4 API access which incurs ongoing costs
  • Limited to specific game environments and may not generalize easily
  • Research prototype not production ready for general use

Key facts

What we have checked

Days since the last commit
1,083
Checked GitHub
GitHub forks
20
Checked GitHub
GitHub stars
166
Checked GitHub
Open issues
1
Checked GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days
0
Checked GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Health and security

Is Suspicion-Agent looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

0 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked . How it is worked out

PartPointsWhat we saw
Recent activity0 of 30Last push 1,083 days ago
Releases0 of 150 releases in 90 days
Issue repliesNot countedThe latest check has no issue response reading (fewer than 3 measured issues, or issues switched off)
Maintainer0 of 15Owned by a single user
Official sourceNot countedMCP servers only

Sources

Where this comes from

  • GitHubRegistry

    Checked · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.

Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.