Enterprise DNA
Directories / Compare / Devin vs OpenHands vs Manus

Compare

Devin vs OpenHands vs Manus

Three autonomous agents on different autonomy-to-cost and closed-to-open spectrums

Devin, OpenHands, and Manus are the three shipping autonomous agents with real sandboxes and terminal access. Each trades off cost, control, and openness differently. Compared on pricing, task horizon, reliability, and which bets win where.

The contenders

Each pick links through to its full Directories entry.

A Agents

Devin

by Cognition Labs

The autonomous software engineer. Plan, write, test, and ship in a sandboxed cloud workstation.

Best for: Teams ready to hand a ticket to a junior engineer equivalent and walk away for hours
Read the full entry
A Agents

OpenHands

by All Hands AI

Open-source autonomous coding agent platform. Spins up a sandboxed dev environment, ships PRs end to end.

Best for: Teams who want a real autonomous coding agent and can run their own infrastructure
Read the full entry
A Agents

Manus

by Manus AI

General-purpose autonomous agent. Give it a goal in natural language, watch it plan, browse, code, and ship.

Best for: Anyone curious where the general-purpose autonomous agent ceiling sits in 2026
Read the full entry

Side by side

Same criteria, three answers. The verdict is opinionated and lives below the table.

Criterion DevinOpenHandsManus
Pricing model Per-task, flat fee or monthly subscription depending on tierOpen-source, free; infrastructure costs on youPer-run usage-based, costs vary with task complexity
Deployment Cloud sandbox, zero local setup requiredSelf-hosted in Docker, real ops workCloud sandbox, one-click invite
Task horizon Linear ticket to PR, 2-8 hours, narrow scopeSimilar scope, container overhead in setupOpen-ended briefs, 4-12 hours, can span research plus build
Primary use case Bug fixes and small features from a ticket, handed offBacklog triage and nightly maintenance runsStart with a goal, see what it produces, benchmark capability
Reliability Consistent on narrow scopes, breaks on novel codebasesBounded by the underlying model, sandbox is stableUneven; high ceiling, low floor on different task shapes
Control and customization Limited; you describe the task, it solves it its wayFull; you pick the model, the prompt, the container imageLimited; less control than Devin on solution path
Openness Closed, proprietary; Cognition onlyFully open-source, community-drivenClosed, proprietary; Manus AI only
Best strength Consistency at a narrow job, integration with issue trackersNo vendor lock-in, control and auditabilityGeneral-purpose reasoning across code, design, deployment in one run

Verdict

These three agents answer different trust and cost questions. Devin is the most mature and reliable when your task fits the box: a scoped bug fix or small feature from a ticket. It runs in a cloud sandbox so no local risk, and the Slack integration makes handing off work frictionless. The tradeoff is cost per task and lack of control. OpenHands is the answer for teams who want the same general shape as Devin but cannot accept vendor lock-in or per-task costs. Self-hosting is real work, but you own the whole stack: the model, the prompt, the infrastructure, the audit log. Manus is the wildcard: it aims for general-purpose autonomy across research, coding, design, and deployment in a single run. It succeeds sometimes, which makes it useful as a benchmark, and fails sometimes, which keeps it from being a default.

Pick Devin if you want to set it and forget it on a backlog of well-scoped work, your team is willing to pay per task, and you value the reliability curve. Pick OpenHands if self-hosting is acceptable or even desirable for your org, and you want to keep the agent loop under your control. Pick Manus if the question is not 'solve this for me' but 'how good can a general-purpose autonomous agent get.' The Manus demos are impressive enough that running it once on a complex task (write a market analysis, build and deploy a site, generate a slide deck from a brief) answers whether it replaces weeks of work for your specific motion.

In practice, many teams run more than one. Devin for the production backlog of narrow tasks where you want fire-and-forget, OpenHands in CI for nightly triage runs where you control the whole sandbox, Manus as a design exploration tool where you want to see what end-to-end autonomy can do. None of them compete directly with interactive agents like Cursor or Claude Code; that is a different question. These three compete on whether you hand the agent a ticket and come back in four hours, or you pair-program interactively. If hands-off is your goal, all three are worth a trial. Devin is the safest default.

Free Reference Card

Get the Decision Matrix

A printable one-page comparison card you can save as a PDF and share with your team.

Enter your email. We send one useful update per week. Unsubscribe any time.

Compare other matchups

More head-to-heads across the index.