Enterprise DNA
Directories / Compare / n8n vs Make vs Zapier

Compare

n8n vs Make vs Zapier

Open-source and self-hosted versus cloud SaaS platforms for workflow automation

n8n, Make, and Zapier are automation platforms that connect apps through visual workflows. n8n runs self-hosted or cloud-managed, Make offers a more sophisticated free tier, and Zapier prioritizes simplicity and integration breadth with higher pricing.

The contenders

Each pick links through to its full Directories entry.

P Apps

n8n

by Various

n8n is a workflow automation platform that uniquely combines AI capabilities with business process automation, giving technical teams the flexibility of code with the speed of no

Best for: Teams that need self-hosted control, custom nodes, and don't want vendor lock-in
Read the full entry

make

not yet in the index

Power users and agencies building complex workflows on a tighter budget

zapier

not yet in the index

Non-technical users and companies prioritizing integration breadth and white-glove support

Side by side

Same criteria, three answers. The verdict is opinionated and lives below the table.

Criterion n8nmakezapier
Deployment model Self-hosted (Docker, k8s) or cloud-managed; full data controlCloud-only SaaS; US or EU regionsCloud-only SaaS; US or EU regions
Open-source license Yes, fully open-source (Fair Source); extensible with custom nodesNo, proprietary; limited API for custom integrationsNo, proprietary; no public extensibility
Free tier / entry cost Free for self-hosted; cloud starts ~$25/month with reasonable limitsGenerous free tier (15K operations/month); $9-99/month paid plansFree tier very limited (100 tasks/month); $29/month minimum for real use
Complexity ceiling Extremely high; custom JavaScript, webhooks, database queries, branching logicVery high; comparable to n8n in workflow capability; better UX for complex branchesMedium-high; good visual editor but fewer low-level integration options than n8n/Make
Integration count 700+ apps; strong for modern SaaS; weaker for legacy enterprise systems500+ apps; heavier focus on European/lesser-known tools7000+ integrations; broadest coverage including legacy enterprise systems
Execution model and reliability Webhooks and polling; execution logging and retry built-in; can run on your infrastructureWebhooks and polling; stronger error handling and scenario debugging toolsPolling-first design; execution guarantees through standard SaaS patterns
Vendor lock-in risk Lowest; export workflows as JSON; can migrate to self-hosted versionMedium; workflows are proprietary format; no easy exportHigh; workflow format is proprietary; no standard export; built on platform
Best for teams of size Solo to mid-size; companies avoiding vendor lock-in; developersAgencies and power users; small to mid-size teams with automation demandNon-technical departments; large enterprises with integration breadth needs

Verdict

n8n is an open-source, self-hosted automation platform that gives you full control of your workflows and data; Make is a proprietary SaaS with a generous free tier and sophisticated visual workflow builder; Zapier is the most user-friendly integration-first platform with the broadest app coverage but at premium pricing. Each solves a different tension: n8n prioritizes control and extensibility, Make balances cost with capability, and Zapier trades cost for simplicity and breadth.

Choose n8n if your team includes developers, needs custom integrations, or runs in regulated industries requiring data sovereignty. Pick Make if you're a power user or agency building complex automation and want to minimize tooling costs. Use Zapier if you're non-technical, need integration with uncommon legacy systems, or your workflows are straightforward and you value setup speed over customization.

In practice, n8n and Make serve different markets rather than compete directly. Most organizations pick one and live with it: n8n for engineering teams and startups, Zapier for departments and SMBs, Make for cost-conscious agencies. Trying to use multiple platforms adds operational complexity that rarely pays off. Pick the one that matches your team's technical depth and lock-in tolerance, not the one with the longest feature list.

Free Reference Card

Get the Decision Matrix

A printable one-page comparison card you can save as a PDF and share with your team.

Enter your email. We send one useful update per week. Unsubscribe any time.