astafford8488/agentaegis-mcp
by Various
MCP server for cybersecurity operations — compliance, vuln scans, code security, threat intel. Pay-per-use via x402.
MCP
astafford8488/agentaegis-mcp
Added 4 July 2026
Overview
An MCP server that provides cybersecurity operations including compliance checks, vulnerability scanning, code security analysis, and threat intelligence. It operates on a pay-per-use model via x402.
Best for
Best for
Developers needing on-demand cybersecurity capabilities within MCP-based agent systems
Use cases
- Integrate automated vulnerability scans into an MCP-compatible agent workflow
- Run compliance checks against infrastructure or codebases through a standardized interface
- Fetch threat intelligence data on demand for security monitoring pipelines
How to use
Install
npx -y agentaegis-mcp Tools exposed
compliance_checkvuln_scancode_securitythreat_intel
Tested with
Claude Desktop, Cursor
Example client config
{
"mcpServers": {
"agentaegis": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "agentaegis-mcp"]
}
}
} Notes
An MCP server that provides cybersecurity operations including compliance checks, vulnerability scanning, code security analysis, and threat intelligence. It operates on a pay-per-use model via x402.
0 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-06-27. Licensed MIT.
Use cases
- Integrate automated vulnerability scans into an MCP-compatible agent workflow
- Run compliance checks against infrastructure or codebases through a standardized interface
- Fetch threat intelligence data on demand for security monitoring pipelines
Pros
- Covers multiple security domains in a single MCP server
- Pay-per-use pricing avoids upfront costs for low-volume usage
- Written in TypeScript for type safety and broad ecosystem compatibility
Cons
- Zero stars and no community adoption signals limited real-world testing
- Pay-per-use model may become expensive at scale compared to self-hosted alternatives
- Dependency on x402 payment infrastructure adds complexity and potential vendor lock-in
Indexed from awesome-mcp-servers-punkpeye and enriched against its public facts.
Pros
- Covers multiple security domains in a single MCP server
- Pay-per-use pricing avoids upfront costs for low-volume usage
- Written in TypeScript for type safety and broad ecosystem compatibility
Cons
- Zero stars and no community adoption signals limited real-world testing
- Pay-per-use model may become expensive at scale compared to self-hosted alternatives
- Dependency on x402 payment infrastructure adds complexity and potential vendor lock-in
Pairs with
Other entries in the index that connect to this one. Click through to see the chain.
Get the free Developer’s Field Guide
A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.
Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.
