Enterprise DNA
M MCP Servers Developer low

astafford8488/agentaegis-mcp

by Various

MCP server for cybersecurity operations — compliance, vuln scans, code security, threat intel. Pay-per-use via x402.

A

MCP

astafford8488/agentaegis-mcp

Added 4 July 2026

Overview

An MCP server that provides cybersecurity operations including compliance checks, vulnerability scanning, code security analysis, and threat intelligence. It operates on a pay-per-use model via x402.

Best for

Best for
Developers needing on-demand cybersecurity capabilities within MCP-based agent systems

Use cases

  • Integrate automated vulnerability scans into an MCP-compatible agent workflow
  • Run compliance checks against infrastructure or codebases through a standardized interface
  • Fetch threat intelligence data on demand for security monitoring pipelines

How to use

Install

npx -y agentaegis-mcp

Tools exposed

  • compliance_check
  • vuln_scan
  • code_security
  • threat_intel

Tested with

Claude Desktop, Cursor

Example client config

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentaegis": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "agentaegis-mcp"]
    }
  }
}

Notes

An MCP server that provides cybersecurity operations including compliance checks, vulnerability scanning, code security analysis, and threat intelligence. It operates on a pay-per-use model via x402.

0 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-06-27. Licensed MIT.

Use cases

  • Integrate automated vulnerability scans into an MCP-compatible agent workflow
  • Run compliance checks against infrastructure or codebases through a standardized interface
  • Fetch threat intelligence data on demand for security monitoring pipelines

Pros

  • Covers multiple security domains in a single MCP server
  • Pay-per-use pricing avoids upfront costs for low-volume usage
  • Written in TypeScript for type safety and broad ecosystem compatibility

Cons

  • Zero stars and no community adoption signals limited real-world testing
  • Pay-per-use model may become expensive at scale compared to self-hosted alternatives
  • Dependency on x402 payment infrastructure adds complexity and potential vendor lock-in

Indexed from awesome-mcp-servers-punkpeye and enriched against its public facts.

Pros

  • Covers multiple security domains in a single MCP server
  • Pay-per-use pricing avoids upfront costs for low-volume usage
  • Written in TypeScript for type safety and broad ecosystem compatibility

Cons

  • Zero stars and no community adoption signals limited real-world testing
  • Pay-per-use model may become expensive at scale compared to self-hosted alternatives
  • Dependency on x402 payment infrastructure adds complexity and potential vendor lock-in

Pairs with

Other entries in the index that connect to this one. Click through to see the chain.