Enterprise DNA
M MCP Servers Developer low

co-browser/attestable-mcp-server

by Various

Verify that any MCP server is running the intended and untampered code via hardware attestation.

C

MCP

co-browser/attestable-mcp-server

Added 1 June 2026

#mcp #mcp-server #remote-attestation #tee #verification

Overview

This tool uses hardware attestation to verify that any MCP server is running the intended and untampered code. It wraps the server startup process and checks integrity before execution.

Best for

Best for
Developers deploying MCP servers in zero-trust or compliance-sensitive environments where code tampering is a risk.

Use cases

  • Ensure deployed MCP servers have not been modified or replaced.
  • Integrate attestation checks into CI/CD pipelines for MCP server builds.
  • Audit remote MCP server instances for code integrity in multi-tenant environments.

How to use

Tools exposed

  • docker
  • gramine-sgx-gen-private-key
  • uv
  • gsc

Notes

This tool uses hardware attestation to verify that any MCP server is running the intended and untampered code. It wraps the server startup process and checks integrity before execution.

18 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-05-20.

Use cases

  • Ensure deployed MCP servers have not been modified or replaced.
  • Integrate attestation checks into CI/CD pipelines for MCP server builds.
  • Audit remote MCP server instances for code integrity in multi-tenant environments.

Pros

  • Provides strong, hardware-backed integrity verification.
  • Open source with a permissive license (MIT).
  • Simple integration via a wrapper for existing MCP servers.

Cons

  • Requires hardware that supports attestation (e.g., TPM 2.0 or Intel SGX).
  • Low project maturity (18 stars, very early stage).
  • Setup and configuration may be complex for non-security experts.

Indexed from awesome-mcp-servers-punkpeye and enriched against its public facts.

Pros

  • Provides strong, hardware-backed integrity verification.
  • Open source with a permissive license (MIT).
  • Simple integration via a wrapper for existing MCP servers.

Cons

  • Requires hardware that supports attestation (e.g., TPM 2.0 or Intel SGX).
  • Low project maturity (18 stars, very early stage).
  • Setup and configuration may be complex for non-security experts.
Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

Running a business, not writing the code? See the MCP servers picked for operators, and get your first one wired up with us.

Operator picks