Enterprise DNA
M MCP Servers Developer low

getmockd/mockd

by Various

High-performance, multi-protocol mock server. HTTP, WebSocket, gRPC, MQTT, SSE, GraphQL, SOAP in one binary.

G

MCP

getmockd/mockd

Added 1 June 2026

#api-mocking #chaos-engineering #cli #developer-tools #golang #graphql #grpc #mcp

Overview

Mockd is a high-performance mock server supporting HTTP, WebSocket, gRPC, MQTT, SSE, GraphQL, and SOAP in a single Go binary. It allows developers to simulate multiple backend services for testing and development without running separate servers.

Best for

Best for
Developers needing a lightweight multi-protocol mock server for testing and prototyping

Use cases

  • Mocking REST APIs for frontend development
  • Simulating WebSocket and gRPC services for integration tests
  • Stubbing MQTT and SSE endpoints for IoT or real-time applications

Notes

Mockd is a high-performance mock server supporting HTTP, WebSocket, gRPC, MQTT, SSE, GraphQL, and SOAP in a single Go binary. It allows developers to simulate multiple backend services for testing and development without running separate servers.

123 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-05-18. Licensed Apache-2.0.

Use cases

  • Mocking REST APIs for frontend development
  • Simulating WebSocket and gRPC services for integration tests
  • Stubbing MQTT and SSE endpoints for IoT or real-time applications

Pros

  • Single binary covers many protocols reducing setup complexity
  • High-performance suitable for load testing scenarios
  • Open source with Go language for easy customization

Cons

  • Relatively small community (123 stars) may mean fewer examples or contributions
  • Each protocol may lack advanced features compared to dedicated mock tools
  • Documentation and tutorials may be limited

Indexed from awesome-mcp-servers-punkpeye and enriched against its public facts.

Pros

  • Single binary covers many protocols reducing setup complexity
  • High-performance suitable for load testing scenarios
  • Open source with Go language for easy customization

Cons

  • Relatively small community (123 stars) may mean fewer examples or contributions
  • Each protocol may lack advanced features compared to dedicated mock tools
  • Documentation and tutorials may be limited