gvasile29/qai-consultant
by Various
AI-powered QA Architect agent — generates ISTQB/OWASP/IEEE/ISO-grounded Test Strategies, Risk Registers, Effort Estimates & Test Plans via RAG. Cloud-hosted (Mistral API + Pinecone
MCP
gvasile29/qai-consultant
Added 3 Sept 2026
Overview
An AI-powered QA Architect agent that generates Test Strategies, Risk Registers, Effort Estimates, and Test Plans grounded in ISTQB, OWASP, IEEE, and ISO standards. It uses retrieval-augmented generation and is cloud-hosted through the Mistral API and Pinecone. The project is written in Python.
Best for
Best for
QA engineers and test architects who want standards-based, AI-generated planning documents
Use cases
- Generate standards-aligned test strategies for a project
- Create risk registers and effort estimates for QA planning
- Produce test plans based on recognized QA and security frameworks
How to use
Install
uvx qai-consultant-mcp Tools exposed
MISTRAL_API_KEYOPENROUTER_API_KEYPINECONE_API_KEYPINECONE_INDEX_NAMEretrieve_qa_knowledgelist_kb_sourcesestimate_qa_effortreview_qa_documentanalyze_test_results
Tested with
Claude Desktop, Claude Code
Notes
An AI-powered QA Architect agent that generates Test Strategies, Risk Registers, Effort Estimates, and Test Plans grounded in ISTQB, OWASP, IEEE, and ISO standards. It uses retrieval-augmented generation and is cloud-hosted through the Mistral API and Pinecone. The project is written in Python.
4 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-09-02.
Use cases
- Generate standards-aligned test strategies for a project
- Create risk registers and effort estimates for QA planning
- Produce test plans based on recognized QA and security frameworks
Pros
- Grounded in multiple established standards
- Structured outputs covering key QA planning artifacts
- RAG-based retrieval for context-aware generation
Cons
- Requires external cloud services for API and vector storage
- Limited community validation with only 4 stars
- Unclear long-term maintenance due to no primary vendor
Indexed from awesome-mcp-servers-punkpeye and enriched against its public facts.
Pros
- Grounded in multiple established standards
- Structured outputs covering key QA planning artifacts
- RAG-based retrieval for context-aware generation
Cons
- Requires external cloud services for API and vector storage
- Limited community validation with only 4 stars
- Unclear long-term maintenance due to no primary vendor
Get the free Developer’s Field Guide
A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.
Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.
