Enterprise DNA
M MCP Servers Developer low

joergmichno/clawguard-mcp

by Various

MCP Server for ClawGuard Shield — security scanning via Model Context Protocol.

J

MCP

joergmichno/clawguard-mcp

Added 1 June 2026

#ai-security #claude-desktop #mcp #mcp-server #model-context-protocol #prompt-injection

Overview

An MCP server that exposes ClawGuard Shield security scanning through the Model Context Protocol. It lets AI agents and tools invoke ClawGuard scans directly via standard MCP messages.

Best for

Best for
Developers building MCP-aware agents that need on-demand vulnerability scanning via ClawGuard

Use cases

  • Integrate vulnerability scanning into AI-assisted code review workflows
  • Enable AI agents to perform security checks on files or repositories
  • Add ClawGuard Shield capabilities to MCP-compatible assistants

Notes

An MCP server that exposes ClawGuard Shield security scanning through the Model Context Protocol. It lets AI agents and tools invoke ClawGuard scans directly via standard MCP messages.

0 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-04-02. Licensed MIT.

Use cases

  • Integrate vulnerability scanning into AI-assisted code review workflows
  • Enable AI agents to perform security checks on files or repositories
  • Add ClawGuard Shield capabilities to MCP-compatible assistants

Pros

  • Brings security scanning functionality into MCP-native applications
  • Open source Python implementation, easy to extend or audit
  • Leverages ClawGuard Shield without requiring custom API bridges

Cons

  • Zero stars and minimal community adoption suggest limited reliability or maturity
  • Depends on ClawGuard Shield infrastructure, adding external setup overhead
  • No detailed documentation or usage examples beyond the repository description

Indexed from awesome-mcp-servers-punkpeye and enriched against its public facts.

Pros

  • Brings security scanning functionality into MCP-native applications
  • Open source Python implementation, easy to extend or audit
  • Leverages ClawGuard Shield without requiring custom API bridges

Cons

  • Zero stars and minimal community adoption suggest limited reliability or maturity
  • Depends on ClawGuard Shield infrastructure, adding external setup overhead
  • No detailed documentation or usage examples beyond the repository description