Enterprise DNA Enterprise DNA
M MCP Servers Developer low

ly8427/mcp-review-board

by Various

MCP review board that lets different coding agents review each other — object → revise → pass, append-only audit trail. For Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Trae, ZCode.

MCP

ly8427/mcp-review-board

Added 10 Oct 2026

#ai-agents #claude-code #code-review #mcp #mcp-server #multi-agent

Overview

MCP review board that lets different coding agents review each other. It implements an object, revise, pass workflow with an append-only audit trail. Supports Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Trae, and ZCode.

Best for

Best for
Teams running multiple coding agents that need a lightweight review handoff process.

Use cases

  • Coordinate review handoffs between Claude Code and Codex
  • Maintain an append-only audit trail of agent revisions
  • Enforce a pass or revise gate before merging agent output

How to use

Install

python3 -m venv .venv && .venv/bin/python -m pip install -r requirements.txt

Tools exposed

  • get_protocol
  • list_participants
  • create_thread
  • post_comment
  • reply_comment
  • list_threads
  • get_thread
  • set_status
  • list_comments_since
  • set_verdict
  • bump_revision
  • set_quorum
  • reliability_profile
  • REVIEWBOARD_PORT
  • REVIEWBOARD_HOST
  • REVIEWBOARD_DB
  • REVIEWBOARD_THREAD_CAP
  • REVIEWBOARD_UNACKED_REISSUE_MIN
  • REVIEWBOARD_AUTO_ACK_REISSUE_HOURS

Tested with

Claude Code, Cursor

Notes

MCP review board that lets different coding agents review each other. It implements an object, revise, pass workflow with an append-only audit trail. Supports Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Trae, and ZCode.

0 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-10-08. Licensed MIT.

Use cases

  • Coordinate review handoffs between Claude Code and Codex
  • Maintain an append-only audit trail of agent revisions
  • Enforce a pass or revise gate before merging agent output

Pros

  • Works across multiple coding agents
  • Append-only audit trail provides accountability
  • Simple three-step workflow

Cons

  • No GitHub stars yet, so adoption is unproven
  • Requires MCP setup for each supported agent
  • Limited to the listed agents

Indexed from awesome-mcp-servers-punkpeye and enriched against its public facts.

Pros

  • Works across multiple coding agents
  • Append-only audit trail provides accountability
  • Simple three-step workflow

Cons

  • No GitHub stars yet, so adoption is unproven
  • Requires MCP setup for each supported agent
  • Limited to the listed agents
Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

Running a business, not writing the code? See the MCP servers picked for operators, and get your first one wired up with us.

Operator picks