Enterprise DNA
M MCP Servers Developer low

nikhilnt1234/TokenBurnRate

by Various

[](https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/nikhilnt1234/TokenBurnRate) ๐Ÿ“‡ ๐Ÿ  - Track LLM token costs across Claude, GPT and Gemini. MCP server + CLI with optimization hints and $ savings esti

N

MCP

nikhilnt1234/TokenBurnRate

Added 7 June 2026

Overview

TokenBurnRate tracks LLM token costs across models from Claude, GPT, and Gemini. It delivers an MCP server and a CLI, with optimization hints and estimated cost savings.

Best for

Best for
Developers who need to monitor and optimize LLM API costs across multiple providers

Use cases

  • Monitor token spend across multiple LLM providers in real time
  • Identify cost-saving opportunities from usage patterns
  • Integrate cost tracking into development workflows via MCP or CLI

Notes

TokenBurnRate tracks LLM token costs across models from Claude, GPT, and Gemini. It delivers an MCP server and a CLI, with optimization hints and estimated cost savings.

0 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-06-03. Licensed MIT.

Use cases

  • Monitor token spend across multiple LLM providers in real time
  • Identify cost-saving opportunities from usage patterns
  • Integrate cost tracking into development workflows via MCP or CLI

Pros

  • Supports three major LLM providers (Claude, GPT, Gemini)
  • Provides both an MCP server and a CLI for flexible integration
  • Offers actionable optimization hints and cost savings estimates

Cons

  • Low community adoption (0 GitHub stars) indicates limited validation
  • Focused solely on cost tracking, no usage management or budgeting features
  • Requires manual setup and configuration for each provider

Indexed from awesome-mcp-servers-punkpeye and enriched against its public facts.

Pros

  • Supports three major LLM providers (Claude, GPT, Gemini)
  • Provides both an MCP server and a CLI for flexible integration
  • Offers actionable optimization hints and cost savings estimates

Cons

  • Low community adoption (0 GitHub stars) indicates limited validation
  • Focused solely on cost tracking, no usage management or budgeting features
  • Requires manual setup and configuration for each provider