Enterprise DNA
M MCP Servers Developer low

ofershap/mcp-server-github-actions

by Various

MCP server for GitHub Actions — view runs, read logs, re-run jobs, trigger workflows

O

MCP

ofershap/mcp-server-github-actions

Added 1 June 2026

#ai #ci-cd #claude #cursor #github-actions #llm #mcp #mcp-server

Overview

This tool is a server that implements the Model Context Protocol to interface with GitHub Actions. It allows viewing workflow runs, reading logs, re-running jobs, and triggering workflows. Built in TypeScript.

Best for

Best for
Developers wanting to integrate GitHub Actions monitoring and control into MCP-capable tools

Use cases

  • Viewing workflow run status and logs
  • Re-running failed jobs from a command-line tool
  • Triggering workflows from external applications

Notes

This tool is a server that implements the Model Context Protocol to interface with GitHub Actions. It allows viewing workflow runs, reading logs, re-running jobs, and triggering workflows. Built in TypeScript.

3 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-03-10. Licensed MIT.

Use cases

  • Viewing workflow run status and logs
  • Re-running failed jobs from a command-line tool
  • Triggering workflows from external applications

Pros

  • Provides direct access to GitHub Actions via a standard protocol
  • Simple interface for common CI/CD operations
  • TypeScript codebase for easy contribution and extension

Cons

  • Limited community adoption (3 stars) may indicate immaturity or minimal testing
  • Dependent on the MCP ecosystem being stable and supported
  • Lacks advanced features like workflow creation or complex debugging out of the box

Indexed from awesome-mcp-servers-punkpeye and enriched against its public facts.

Pros

  • Provides direct access to GitHub Actions via a standard protocol
  • Simple interface for common CI/CD operations
  • TypeScript codebase for easy contribution and extension

Cons

  • Limited community adoption (3 stars) may indicate immaturity or minimal testing
  • Dependent on the MCP ecosystem being stable and supported
  • Lacks advanced features like workflow creation or complex debugging out of the box