Enterprise DNA
M MCP Servers Developer low

QuackbackIO/quackback

by Various

Open source alternative to Canny, UserVoice, Productboard

Q

MCP

QuackbackIO/quackback

Added 1 June 2026

#changelog #customer-feedback #feature-requests #feedback #feedback-collection #product-management #roadmaps #self-hosted

Overview

Quackback is an open source feedback management tool that serves as an alternative to Canny, UserVoice, and Productboard. It is built with TypeScript and allows teams to collect, organize, and prioritize user feedback directly from their own infrastructure.

Best for

Best for
Teams that want full control over their feedback pipeline and prefer open source over SaaS subscriptions.

Use cases

  • Self-hosting a customer feedback portal for product teams
  • Collecting and voting on feature requests from users
  • Prioritizing product roadmap items based on user input

Notes

Quackback is an open source feedback management tool that serves as an alternative to Canny, UserVoice, and Productboard. It is built with TypeScript and allows teams to collect, organize, and prioritize user feedback directly from their own infrastructure.

109 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-06-01. Licensed AGPL-3.0.

Use cases

  • Self-hosting a customer feedback portal for product teams
  • Collecting and voting on feature requests from users
  • Prioritizing product roadmap items based on user input

Pros

  • Open source with no vendor lock-in or per-user fees
  • Lightweight and self-hosted, giving full data control
  • TypeScript codebase for easier customization and integration

Cons

  • Small community (109 stars) means limited support and plugins
  • Requires self-hosting and maintenance effort
  • Fewer features than mature commercial alternatives

Indexed from awesome-mcp-servers-punkpeye and enriched against its public facts.

Pros

  • Open source with no vendor lock-in or per-user fees
  • Lightweight and self-hosted, giving full data control
  • TypeScript codebase for easier customization and integration

Cons

  • Small community (109 stars) means limited support and plugins
  • Requires self-hosting and maintenance effort
  • Fewer features than mature commercial alternatives