Enterprise DNA
M MCP Servers Developer low

realwigu/mcp-doctor

by Various

Diagnose, secure, and benchmark your MCP servers. Zero-config CLI for Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, and Windsurf.

R

MCP

realwigu/mcp-doctor

Added 1 June 2026

#claude #cli #cursor #devtools #mcp #mcp-server #model-context-protocol #security

Overview

A zero-configuration CLI tool that diagnoses, secures, and benchmarks MCP servers. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, and Windsurf to identify configuration issues, assess security posture, and measure performance without manual setup.

Best for

Best for
Developers using MCP servers who need a quick, all-in-one diagnostic and security check without configuration overhead

Use cases

  • Diagnose misconfigurations in MCP server connections
  • Benchmark MCP server response times and reliability
  • Audit security vulnerabilities in MCP endpoints

Notes

A zero-configuration CLI tool that diagnoses, secures, and benchmarks MCP servers. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, and Windsurf to identify configuration issues, assess security posture, and measure performance without manual setup.

1 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-03-14. Licensed MIT.

Use cases

  • Diagnose misconfigurations in MCP server connections
  • Benchmark MCP server response times and reliability
  • Audit security vulnerabilities in MCP endpoints

Pros

  • Zero-configuration setup reduces friction for quick diagnostics
  • Supports multiple popular IDEs and AI coding tools
  • Combines security scanning and performance benchmarking in one tool

Cons

  • Very limited adoption (1 GitHub star) indicates early-stage reliability concerns
  • Only applicable to MCP protocol workflows, not general server diagnostics
  • Requires Node.js and TypeScript runtime, adding a dependency for non-JS environments

Indexed from awesome-mcp-servers-punkpeye and enriched against its public facts.

Pros

  • Zero-configuration setup reduces friction for quick diagnostics
  • Supports multiple popular IDEs and AI coding tools
  • Combines security scanning and performance benchmarking in one tool

Cons

  • Very limited adoption (1 GitHub star) indicates early-stage reliability concerns
  • Only applicable to MCP protocol workflows, not general server diagnostics
  • Requires Node.js and TypeScript runtime, adding a dependency for non-JS environments