Model comparison
Baidu: CoBuddy (free) vs Baidu: Qianfan-OCR-Fast
Compare Baidu: CoBuddy (free) and Baidu: Qianfan-OCR-Fast: input/output $/Mtoken, context window, modalities, and license. OpenRouter-synced pricing.
Baidu
Baidu: CoBuddy (free)
Free provider route for experiments, demos, and cost-sensitive chat workloads
Baidu
Baidu: Qianfan-OCR-Fast
OCR model for extracting structured text from documents and screenshots
| Metric | Baidu: CoBuddy (free) | Baidu: Qianfan-OCR-Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Baidu |
| Context window | 131,072 | 65,536 |
| Input $/Mtok | $0 | $0.680 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0 | $2.81 |
| Modalities | text | text, vision |
| License | closed | closed |
Quick take
On input price, Baidu: CoBuddy (free) is cheaper at $0/Mtok. For context window, Baidu: CoBuddy (free) leads with 131,072 tokens.
Pick based on your workload: high-volume cheap inference vs long-document / agent loops. Enterprise DNA can wire either model into Omni with evals, secrets, and job orchestration.