Model comparison
FLUX.1 Kontext Pro vs FLUX.1 Fill [pro]
Compare FLUX.1 Kontext Pro and FLUX.1 Fill [pro]: input/output $/Mtoken, context window, modalities, and license. OpenRouter-synced pricing.
Bfl
FLUX.1 Kontext Pro
Image model for prompt-driven generation, editing, and visual design workflows
Bfl
FLUX.1 Fill [pro]
Image model for prompt-driven generation, editing, and visual design workflows
| Metric | FLUX.1 Kontext Pro | FLUX.1 Fill [pro] |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Bfl | Bfl |
| Context window | 512 | 512 |
| Input $/Mtok | $0 | $0 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0 | $0 |
| Modalities | text | text |
| License | closed | closed |
Quick take
On input price, FLUX.1 Kontext Pro is cheaper at $0/Mtok. For context window, FLUX.1 Kontext Pro leads with 512 tokens.
Pick based on your workload: high-volume cheap inference vs long-document / agent loops. Enterprise DNA can wire either model into Omni with evals, secrets, and job orchestration.