Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard
by Community
Explore The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (also called The Berkeley Tool Calling Leaderboard) to see the LLM
OSS
Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard
Added 1 June 2026
Overview
The Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard (also called the Berkeley Tool Calling Leaderboard) is a community-driven benchmark that evaluates and ranks large language models based on their ability to correctly invoke functions and use tools. It provides a standardized set of API-calling tasks to compare model performance across diverse real-world scenarios.
Best for
Best for
Developers and researchers evaluating LLMs for tool-use and function-calling applications
Use cases
- Comparing LLMs for function-calling accuracy in tool-use applications
- Selecting a model that best handles structured API calls and multi-step tool usage
- Benchmarking custom models against state-of-the-art results on function-calling tasks
Notes
The Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard (also called the Berkeley Tool Calling Leaderboard) is a community-driven benchmark that evaluates and ranks large language models based on their ability to correctly invoke functions and use tools. It provides a standardized set of API-calling tasks to compare model performance across diverse real-world scenarios.
Use cases
- Comparing LLMs for function-calling accuracy in tool-use applications
- Selecting a model that best handles structured API calls and multi-step tool usage
- Benchmarking custom models against state-of-the-art results on function-calling tasks
Pros
- Open and transparent benchmark with community-contributed data
- Covers a wide range of function categories and realistic API patterns
- Regularly updated with new models and tasks
Cons
- Leaderboard performance may not fully translate to every production environment
- Models can be fine-tuned to overfit specific benchmark tasks
- Limited to function-calling evaluation; does not assess other model capabilities
Indexed from awesome-llm and enriched against its public facts.
Pros
- Open and transparent benchmark with community-contributed data
- Covers a wide range of function categories and realistic API patterns
- Regularly updated with new models and tasks
Cons
- Leaderboard performance may not fully translate to every production environment
- Models can be fine-tuned to overfit specific benchmark tasks
- Limited to function-calling evaluation; does not assess other model capabilities
Pairs with
Other entries in the index that connect to this one. Click through to see the chain.
lm-evaluation-harness
Community
A framework for few-shot evaluation of language models.
OpenAI Evals
Community
Evals is a framework for evaluating LLMs and LLM systems, and an open-source registry of benchmarks.
Get the free Developer’s Field Guide
A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.
Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.