Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Open Source

Bruno

by usebruno

Opensource IDE For Exploring and Testing API's (lightweight alternative to Postman/Insomnia)

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed Bruno yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About Bruno

Opensource IDE For Exploring and Testing API's (lightweight alternative to Postman/Insomnia)

Best for

Developers and teams who prefer Git-centric, offline-first API testing workflows.

Use cases

  • Design and debug REST API requests with a visual interface
  • Organize API collections as files for Git-based team collaboration
  • Run automated API tests in CI/CD pipelines via command-line execution

Notes

47,926 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-10-29. Licensed MIT.

Indexed from swap-build. Verified against the live GitHub repo.

Pros

  • Lightweight and fast compared to Electron-based alternatives
  • Local file storage simplifies version control and code review
  • Open source with a large community (47k+ GitHub stars)

Cons

  • Limited ecosystem of integrations compared to Postman
  • No cloud-based team collaboration features
  • Primarily focused on REST; less support for other protocols

Key facts

What we have checked

Latest version
4.3.0 (released 22 Oct 2026)
Checked GitHub
Days since the last commit
0
Checked GitHub
GitHub forks
3,091
Checked GitHub
GitHub stars
48,256
Checked GitHub
Days to a first reply on issues
0.7
Checked GitHub
Open issues
1,358
Checked GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days
4
Checked GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Stars and usage

How Bruno is growing

GitHub stars

47,961 to 48,256

stars. 31 Oct 2026 to 7 Nov 2026, 2 readings.

Source: GitHub. Checked .

Health and security

Is Bruno looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

100 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked . How it is worked out

PartPointsWhat we saw
Recent activity30 of 30Last push 0 days ago
Releases15 of 154 releases in 90 days
Issue replies20 of 20First reply in 0.7 days (median)
Maintainer15 of 15Owned by an organisation
Official sourceNot countedMCP servers only

Alternatives

Alternatives to Bruno

RecordTypeHow we knowChecked
PostmanThis is an alternative to itProductLinked recordGitHub

Compare

Compare Bruno side by side

Sources

Where this comes from

  • GitHubOfficial

    Checked · Latest version

  • GitHubRegistry

    Checked · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Days to a first reply on issues, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

  1. Released 4.3.0

    Source: GitHub

  2. Released 4.2.1

    Source: GitHub

  3. Released 4.2.0

    Source: GitHub

  4. Released 4.1.0

    Source: GitHub

  5. Released 4.0.0

    Source: GitHub

  6. Released 3.5.3

    Source: GitHub

  7. Released 3.5.2

    Source: GitHub

  8. Released 3.5.1

    Source: GitHub

  9. Released 3.5.0

    Source: GitHub

  10. Released 3.4.2

    Source: GitHub

Open-source & AI alternatives

Swap-in tools that solve the same job. Weigh the trade-offs before you commit.

Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.