Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Open Source

Chain-of-Thoughts Papers

A trend starts from "Chain of Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models".

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed Chain-of-Thoughts Papers yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About Chain-of-Thoughts Papers

A curated list of academic papers on chain-of-thought prompting, starting from the seminal paper that introduced the technique. It serves as a reference for tracking research progress in reasoning with large language models.

Best for

Researchers and developers tracking chain-of-thought reasoning in LLMs

Use cases

  • Staying current with chain-of-thought research papers
  • Finding foundational and recent work on prompting strategies
  • Referencing papers for implementing chain-of-thought in applications

Notes

2,104 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2023-10-05.

Pros

  • Comprehensive collection of key papers in one place
  • Community-maintained with over 2,100 stars indicating quality
  • Easy to browse and discover related work

Cons

  • Only a list of papers, no code or implementation examples
  • May not be updated frequently after initial curation
  • No filtering or search beyond GitHub's basic features

Key facts

What we have checked

Days since the last commit
1,122
Checked GitHub
GitHub forks
143
Checked GitHub
GitHub stars
2,105
Checked GitHub
Days to a first reply on issues
0.3
Checked GitHub
Open issues
0
Checked GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days
0
Checked GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Stars and usage

How Chain-of-Thoughts Papers is growing

GitHub stars

2,104 to 2,105

stars. 12 July 2026 to 31 Oct 2026, 2 readings.

Source: GitHub. Checked .

Health and security

Is Chain-of-Thoughts Papers looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

0 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked . How it is worked out

PartPointsWhat we saw
Archived0Repository is archived

Sources

Where this comes from

  • GitHubRegistry

    Checked · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Days to a first reply on issues, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

  1. Shut down

    Source: GitHub

Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.