Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Open Source

Coder Eval

Playwright for coding agents. Test that your skills, MCP servers, and CLIs actually work when an agent uses them — sandboxed YAML suites, A/B experiments, CI gates.

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed Coder Eval yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About Coder Eval

Coder Eval is an open-source testing framework for coding agents. It lets developers define sandboxed YAML test suites to verify that skills, MCP servers, and CLIs work correctly when used by an agent. It supports A/B experiments and CI gates for regression testing.

Best for

Teams building or maintaining coding agents and their tooling.

Use cases

  • Validate MCP servers work correctly with coding agents
  • Test CLI tools from an agent's perspective
  • Gate CI on agent behavior to prevent regressions

Notes

145 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-10-01. Licensed Apache-2.0.

Pros

  • Sandboxed tests isolate agent runs
  • YAML-based suites are easy to version and review
  • Integrates with CI for automated gates

Cons

  • Community project with limited adoption (145 stars)
  • Requires writing YAML test definitions
  • May not cover all agent frameworks

Key facts

What we have checked

Days since the last commit
0
Checked GitHub
GitHub forks
8
Checked GitHub
GitHub stars
157
Checked GitHub
Days to a first reply on issues
50.8
Checked GitHub
Open issues
14
Checked GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days
28
Checked GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Stars and usage

How Coder Eval is growing

GitHub stars

145 to 157

stars. 1 Oct 2026 to 7 Nov 2026, 3 readings.

Source: GitHub. Checked .

Health and security

Is Coder Eval looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

75 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked . How it is worked out

PartPointsWhat we saw
Recent activity30 of 30Last push 0 days ago
Releases15 of 1528 releases in 90 days
Issue replies0 of 20First reply in 50.8 days (median)
Maintainer15 of 15Owned by an organisation
Official sourceNot countedMCP servers only

Sources

Where this comes from

  • GitHubRegistry

    Checked · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Days to a first reply on issues, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.

Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.