Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Open Source

hermes-rubric

Evidence-first LLM-as-judge scoring for AI artifacts — papers, PRs, prompts, cold emails: synthesizes a rubric, collects quoted-evidence citations, scores only against that evidenc

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed hermes-rubric yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About hermes-rubric

Evidence-first LLM-as-judge scoring for AI artifacts such as papers, PRs, prompts, and cold emails. It synthesizes a rubric, collects quoted-evidence citations, scores only against that evidence, and hedges on thin evidence. Each dimension ties to a file:line or quote, with reproducibility receipts, and supports 7 backends.

Best for

Developers who need auditable, evidence-cited LLM scoring for code, prompts, or written artifacts

Use cases

  • Score pull requests against an evidence-backed rubric
  • Evaluate prompt quality with quoted citations
  • Audit AI-generated text with reproducible file:line references

Notes

2 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-09-29. Licensed Apache-2.0.

Pros

  • Grounds scores in quoted evidence rather than model intuition
  • Provides reproducibility receipts with file:line or quote references
  • Supports 7 backends for deployment flexibility

Cons

  • Early-stage project with few GitHub stars
  • Python-only implementation limits integration options
  • Requires collecting evidence citations before scoring

Key facts

What we have checked

Days since the last commit
6
Checked GitHub
GitHub forks
2
Checked GitHub
GitHub stars
2
Checked GitHub
Days to a first reply on issues
143.8
Checked GitHub
Open issues
2
Checked GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days
7
Checked GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Stars and usage

How hermes-rubric is growing

GitHub stars

2 to 2

stars. 1 Oct 2026 to 6 Nov 2026, 3 readings.

Source: GitHub. Checked .

Health and security

Is hermes-rubric looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

75 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked . How it is worked out

PartPointsWhat we saw
Recent activity30 of 30Last push 6 days ago
Releases15 of 157 releases in 90 days
Issue replies0 of 20First reply in 143.8 days (median)
Maintainer15 of 15Owned by an organisation
Official sourceNot countedMCP servers only

Sources

Where this comes from

  • GitHubRegistry

    Checked · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Days to a first reply on issues, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.

Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.