Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Open Source

Tenuo

Task-scoped authorization for AI agents.

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed Tenuo yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About Tenuo

Tenuo is a Rust library that applies task-scoped authorization to AI agents. It uses cryptographic warrants to constrain which tools and arguments an agent can access, preventing privilege escalation across delegation hops and generating signed evidence of allow or deny decisions.

Best for

Rust developers building AI agents that need auditable, delegation-safe authorization

Use cases

  • Restrict an agent's tool access to a single task
  • Audit agent actions with signed authorization evidence
  • Safely delegate permissions across multi-step agent workflows

Notes

92 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-09-22.

Pros

  • Cryptographic warrants provide strong, verifiable constraints
  • Prevents privilege escalation during agent delegation
  • Produces signed evidence for auditing

Cons

  • Rust-only, limiting adoption outside Rust ecosystems
  • Small community with 92 stars, so limited battle-testing
  • Requires integrating warrant logic into agent tooling

Key facts

What we have checked

Days since the last commit
0
Checked GitHub
GitHub forks
30
Checked GitHub
GitHub stars
105
Checked GitHub
Days to a first reply on issues
0.6
Checked GitHub
Open issues
85
Checked GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days
8
Checked GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Stars and usage

How Tenuo is growing

GitHub stars

92 to 105

stars. 24 Sept 2026 to 7 Nov 2026, 4 readings.

Source: GitHub. Checked .

Health and security

Is Tenuo looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

100 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked . How it is worked out

PartPointsWhat we saw
Recent activity30 of 30Last push 0 days ago
Releases15 of 158 releases in 90 days
Issue replies20 of 20First reply in 0.6 days (median)
Maintainer15 of 15Owned by an organisation
Official sourceNot countedMCP servers only

Sources

Where this comes from

  • GitHubRegistry

    Checked · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Days to a first reply on issues, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.

Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.