Skills

legacy-modernizer

by Jeffallan

67 Specialized Skills for Full-Stack Developers. Transform Claude Code into your expert pair programmer.

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed legacy-modernizer yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About legacy-modernizer

67 Specialized Skills for Full-Stack Developers. Transform Claude Code into your expert pair programmer.

Best for

Developers using Claude Code who need to modernize legacy Python codebases efficiently.

Use cases

Refactor legacy Python code to modern standards
Migrate deprecated APIs to current versions
Automate repetitive modernization tasks in existing projects

Notes

12,283 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-10-30. Licensed MIT.

Indexed from github-skill-repos. Verified against the live GitHub repo.

Pros

Focused on a common developer pain point
Integrates directly with Claude Code for hands-on assistance
Part of a larger skills library with community backing

Cons

Requires Claude Code as a dependency
Limited to Python-focused modernization
May not cover all legacy frameworks or edge cases

Key facts

What we have checked

Days since the last commit: 7; Checked 7 Nov 2026GitHub
GitHub forks: 1,176; Checked 7 Nov 2026GitHub
GitHub stars: 12,254; Checked 7 Nov 2026GitHub
Days to a first reply on issues: 22.8; Checked 7 Nov 2026GitHub
Open issues: 33; Checked 7 Nov 2026GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days: 4; Checked 7 Nov 2026GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Stars and usage

How legacy-modernizer is growing

GitHub stars

12,157 to 12,254

stars. 1 Nov 2026 to 7 Nov 2026, 2 readings.

Source: GitHub. Checked 7 Nov 2026.

Health and security

Is legacy-modernizer looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

63 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked 7 Nov 2026. How it is worked out

Part	Points	What we saw
Recent activity	30 of 30	Last push 7 days ago
Releases	15 of 15	4 releases in 90 days
Issue replies	5.3 of 20	First reply in 22.8 days (median)
Maintainer	0 of 15	Owned by a single user
Official source	Not counted	MCP servers only

Security check static checks

100 out of 100

Reads what is published about the server: package advisories, licence, secrets in the documented setup and tool permissions. Nothing is installed or run, so this is not a security assessment. Checked 24 Oct 2026 by edna-skill-static-v1 main@9e7dbd688015. What it checks

Note 1 of 1 packages are not pinned to one version, so only the malicious packages list was checked for them, not version advisories.

Sources

Where this comes from

GitHubRegistry
Checked 7 Nov 2026 · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Days to a first reply on issues, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog