Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Skills

principle-foundational-thinking

by michael-denyer

Antigravity, Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Gemini, Muse, OpenCode, Pi, and Prime Agent versions of Poteto's pstack.

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed principle-foundational-thinking yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About principle-foundational-thinking

Antigravity, Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Gemini, Muse, OpenCode, Pi, and Prime Agent versions of Poteto's pstack. Rigorous agent workflows with Cursor primitives translated for other harnesses.

Best for

Developers standardizing advanced agent workflows across multiple coding tools.

Use cases

  • Implement structured thinking workflows across multiple AI coding agents
  • Port Cursor-based agent primitives to other development harnesses
  • Standardize agent behavior in teams using different tools

Notes

4,171 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-11-09. Licensed MIT.

Indexed from github-skill-repos. Verified against the live GitHub repo.

Pros

  • Supports a wide range of major coding agents
  • Faithful translation of pstack's rigorous approach
  • Open source with active community (3.4k stars)

Cons

  • Requires JavaScript environment setup
  • May need manual adaptation for non-listed harnesses
  • Complexity of pstack workflows may be overkill for simple tasks

Key facts

What we have checked

Days since the last commit
0
Checked GitHub
GitHub forks
372
Checked GitHub
GitHub stars
4,117
Checked GitHub
Days to a first reply on issues
0.1
Checked GitHub
Open issues
4
Checked GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days
89
Checked GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Stars and usage

How principle-foundational-thinking is growing

GitHub stars

3,712 to 4,117

stars. 1 Nov 2026 to 7 Nov 2026, 2 readings.

Source: GitHub. Checked .

Health and security

Is principle-foundational-thinking looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

81 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked . How it is worked out

PartPointsWhat we saw
Recent activity30 of 30Last push 0 days ago
Releases15 of 1589 releases in 90 days
Issue replies20 of 20First reply in 0.1 days (median)
Maintainer0 of 15Owned by a single user
Official sourceNot countedMCP servers only

Security check static checks

100 out of 100

Reads what is published about the server: package advisories, licence, secrets in the documented setup and tool permissions. Nothing is installed or run, so this is not a security assessment. Checked by edna-skill-static-v1 main@356c6e0f978d. What it checks

  • Note No dependency list or install command was found in the skill, so there were no packages to look up on OSV.

Sources

Where this comes from

  • GitHubRegistry

    Checked · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Days to a first reply on issues, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.

Pairs with

Other entries in the index that connect to this one. Click through to see the chain.

Pairs with5 entries
Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.