Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Skills

Qwik Tailwind

by PatrickJS

📄 Configuration files that enhance Cursor AI editor experience with custom rules and behaviors

Visit PatrickJS ↗

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed Qwik Tailwind yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About Qwik Tailwind

📄 Configuration files that enhance Cursor AI editor experience with custom rules and behaviors

Best for

Developers using Cursor AI editor for Qwik and Tailwind CSS projects

Use cases

  • Improve AI code suggestions for Qwik and Tailwind projects
  • Enforce consistent coding patterns in Cursor editor
  • Streamline setup of custom editor rules for frontend development

Notes

41,137 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-05-30. Licensed CC0-1.0.

Indexed from cursor-rules-repos. Verified against the live GitHub repo.

Pros

  • High community adoption with over 41,000 stars
  • Lightweight JavaScript configuration
  • Directly integrates with Cursor AI editor

Cons

  • Limited to Cursor editor, not portable to other IDEs
  • Requires manual setup and maintenance
  • Specific to Qwik and Tailwind, not general-purpose

Key facts

What we have checked

Days since the last commit
160
Checked GitHub
GitHub forks
3,549
Checked GitHub
GitHub stars
41,121
Checked GitHub
Days to a first reply on issues
80.7
Checked GitHub
Open issues
9
Checked GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days
0
Checked GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Stars and usage

How Qwik Tailwind is growing

GitHub stars

41,075 to 41,121

stars. 1 Nov 2026 to 7 Nov 2026, 2 readings.

Source: GitHub. Checked .

Health and security

Is Qwik Tailwind looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

23 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked . How it is worked out

PartPointsWhat we saw
Recent activity18.4 of 30Last push 160 days ago
Releases0 of 150 releases in 90 days
Issue replies0 of 20First reply in 80.7 days (median)
Maintainer0 of 15Owned by a single user
Official sourceNot countedMCP servers only

Security check static checks

100 out of 100

Reads what is published about the server: package advisories, licence, secrets in the documented setup and tool permissions. Nothing is installed or run, so this is not a security assessment. Checked by edna-skill-static-v1 main@b044f956f021. What it checks

  • Note No dependency list or install command was found in the skill, so there were no packages to look up on OSV.

Sources

Where this comes from

  • GitHubRegistry

    Checked · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Days to a first reply on issues, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.

Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

← Back to SkillsSubmit your own entry →