Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Skills

soul-grader

by cobibean

Hermes Agent skill for grading SOUL.md identity files with a research-backed rubric and public-safe field guide.

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed soul-grader yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About soul-grader

soul-grader is a Hermes Agent skill that grades SOUL.md identity files using a research-backed rubric and a public-safe field guide. It evaluates the structure and content of identity files to provide actionable feedback.

Best for

Developers building and refining SOUL.md identity files within Hermes Agent workflows.

Use cases

  • Assess the quality of SOUL.md files for agent projects
  • Provide structured feedback to improve identity file clarity
  • Integrate grading into Hermes Agent workflows

Notes

61 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-08-22. Licensed MIT.

Pros

  • Research-backed rubric ensures consistent evaluation
  • Public-safe field guide makes it accessible for community use
  • Simple integration as a Hermes Agent skill

Cons

  • Limited to SOUL.md files, not general-purpose grading
  • Requires Hermes Agent environment to run
  • Small project with 61 stars, may have limited community support

Key facts

What we have checked

Days since the last commit
76
Checked GitHub
GitHub forks
3
Checked GitHub
GitHub stars
61
Checked GitHub
Open issues
0
Checked GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days
0
Checked GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Stars and usage

How soul-grader is growing

GitHub stars

60 to 61

stars. 1 Nov 2026 to 7 Nov 2026, 2 readings.

Source: GitHub. Checked .

Health and security

Is soul-grader looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

43 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked . How it is worked out

PartPointsWhat we saw
Recent activity25.9 of 30Last push 76 days ago
Releases0 of 150 releases in 90 days
Issue repliesNot countedThe latest check has no issue response reading (fewer than 3 measured issues, or issues switched off)
Maintainer0 of 15Owned by a single user
Official sourceNot countedMCP servers only

Security check static checks

100 out of 100

Reads what is published about the server: package advisories, licence, secrets in the documented setup and tool permissions. Nothing is installed or run, so this is not a security assessment. Checked by edna-skill-static-v1 main@56fdda5c57e2. What it checks

  • Note No dependency list or install command was found in the skill, so there were no packages to look up on OSV.

Sources

Where this comes from

  • GitHubRegistry

    Checked · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.

Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.