Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Skills

spec-driven-development

by addyosmani

Production-grade engineering skills for AI coding agents.

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed spec-driven-development yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About spec-driven-development

Production-grade engineering skills for AI coding agents.

Best for

Developers building with AI agents who need structured engineering discipline

Use cases

  • Guide AI agents to create detailed specifications before coding
  • Improve code architecture and maintainability in agent-generated projects
  • Enforce engineering standards in automated development workflows

Notes

114,397 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-11-01. Licensed MIT.

Indexed from skills-sh. Verified against the live GitHub repo.

Pros

  • High community trust with over 110k stars
  • Established by a well-known engineering leader
  • Practical, production-oriented approach

Cons

  • May require adaptation to fit specific agent frameworks
  • Not a library, guidance-based, so requires manual integration
  • Limited to JavaScript context, not language-agnostic

Key facts

What we have checked

Days since the last commit
5
Checked GitHub
GitHub forks
11,891
Checked GitHub
GitHub stars
113,786
Checked GitHub
Installs
63.9K
Checked skills.sh
Days to a first reply on issues
1.7
Checked GitHub
Open issues
57
Checked GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days
9
Checked GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Stars and usage

How spec-driven-development is growing

GitHub stars

112,122 to 113,786

stars. 31 Oct 2026 to 7 Nov 2026, 2 readings.

Source: GitHub. Checked .

Health and security

Is spec-driven-development looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

81 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked . How it is worked out

PartPointsWhat we saw
Recent activity30 of 30Last push 5 days ago
Releases15 of 159 releases in 90 days
Issue replies20 of 20First reply in 1.7 days (median)
Maintainer0 of 15Owned by a single user
Official sourceNot countedMCP servers only

Security check static checks

100 out of 100

Reads what is published about the server: package advisories, licence, secrets in the documented setup and tool permissions. Nothing is installed or run, so this is not a security assessment. Checked by edna-skill-static-v1 main@aeac41d4d005. What it checks

  • Note No dependency list or install command was found in the skill, so there were no packages to look up on OSV.

Sources

Where this comes from

  • GitHubRegistry

    Checked · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Days to a first reply on issues, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

  • skills.shThird party

    Checked · Installs

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.

Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.