Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Skills

upstash-workflow-js

by upstash

Durable, Reliable and Performant Serverless Functions

Visit upstash ↗

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed upstash-workflow-js yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About upstash-workflow-js

Durable, Reliable and Performant Serverless Functions

Best for

Developers building serverless applications that need durable, reliable multi-step workflows.

Use cases

  • Orchestrating multi-step serverless workflows with automatic retries
  • Building durable functions that maintain state across invocations
  • Implementing reliable background jobs or scheduled tasks in serverless environments

Notes

159 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-11-09. Licensed MIT.

Indexed from github-skill-md. Verified against the live GitHub repo.

Pros

  • Durable execution ensures workflows complete despite failures
  • Built on Upstash, offering low latency and high reliability
  • TypeScript support provides type safety for workflow definitions

Cons

  • Requires Upstash infrastructure, adding a dependency
  • Limited to serverless environments, not suitable for traditional servers
  • Small community (157 stars) may mean fewer examples and resources

Key facts

What we have checked

Days since the last commit
10
Checked GitHub
GitHub forks
27
Checked GitHub
GitHub stars
159
Checked GitHub
Days to a first reply on issues
3.7
Checked GitHub
Open issues
9
Checked GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days
3
Checked GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Stars and usage

How upstash-workflow-js is growing

GitHub stars

160 to 159

stars. 1 Nov 2026 to 7 Nov 2026, 2 readings.

Source: GitHub. Checked .

Health and security

Is upstash-workflow-js looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

99 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked . How it is worked out

PartPointsWhat we saw
Recent activity30 of 30Last push 10 days ago
Releases15 of 153 releases in 90 days
Issue replies19.5 of 20First reply in 3.7 days (median)
Maintainer15 of 15Owned by an organisation
Official sourceNot countedMCP servers only

Security check static checks

100 out of 100

Reads what is published about the server: package advisories, licence, secrets in the documented setup and tool permissions. Nothing is installed or run, so this is not a security assessment. Checked by edna-skill-static-v1 main@2f367b4ee043. What it checks

  • Note 2 of 2 packages are not pinned to one version, so only the malicious packages list was checked for them, not version advisories.

Sources

Where this comes from

  • GitHubRegistry

    Checked · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Days to a first reply on issues, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.

Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

← Back to SkillsSubmit your own entry →