Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Skills

weights-and-biases

by Orchestra-Research

Comprehensive open-source library of AI research and engineering skills for any AI model.

Visit Orchestra-Research ↗

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed weights-and-biases yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About weights-and-biases

Comprehensive open-source library of AI research and engineering skills for any AI model. Package the skills and your claude code/codex/gemini agent will be an AI research agent with full horsepower. Maintained by Orchestra Research.

Best for

Developers building AI research agents with existing coding tools.

Use cases

  • Equip coding agents with research and engineering skills
  • Enhance agent capabilities for AI model tasks
  • Integrate with Claude Code, Codex, or Gemini agents

Notes

14,387 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-10-11. Licensed MIT.

Indexed from github-skill-repos. Verified against the live GitHub repo.

Pros

  • Comprehensive skill library
  • Open-source and actively maintained
  • Works across multiple agent platforms

Cons

  • Written in TeX, which may limit accessibility
  • Requires integration with specific agents
  • No detailed documentation provided

Key facts

What we have checked

Days since the last commit
27
Checked GitHub
GitHub forks
995
Checked GitHub
GitHub stars
14,324
Checked GitHub
Days to a first reply on issues
58.8
Checked GitHub
Open issues
11
Checked GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days
0
Checked GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Stars and usage

How weights-and-biases is growing

GitHub stars

14,169 to 14,324

stars. 1 Nov 2026 to 7 Nov 2026, 2 readings.

Source: GitHub. Checked .

Health and security

Is weights-and-biases looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

56 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked . How it is worked out

PartPointsWhat we saw
Recent activity30 of 30Last push 27 days ago
Releases0 of 150 releases in 90 days
Issue replies0 of 20First reply in 58.8 days (median)
Maintainer15 of 15Owned by an organisation
Official sourceNot countedMCP servers only

Security check static checks

100 out of 100

Reads what is published about the server: package advisories, licence, secrets in the documented setup and tool permissions. Nothing is installed or run, so this is not a security assessment. Checked by edna-skill-static-v1 main@773a52944ba4. What it checks

  • Note 1 of 1 packages are not pinned to one version, so only the malicious packages list was checked for them, not version advisories.

Sources

Where this comes from

  • GitHubRegistry

    Checked · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Days to a first reply on issues, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.

Pairs with

Other entries in the index that connect to this one. Click through to see the chain.

Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

← Back to SkillsSubmit your own entry →