Models · Best vision
Claude 3.5 Haiku
by Anthropic
Fast Claude model for responsive assistance, classification, and lightweight agents.
Our verdict
We have not reviewed Claude 3.5 Haiku yet
No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.
From the listing
About Claude 3.5 Haiku
Fast Claude model for responsive assistance, classification, and lightweight agents.
Notes
Claude 3.5 Haiku is listed in the EDNA Models directory, sourced from models.dev.
Key facts
What we have checked
- Gpqa diamond
- 38.1% (for 22 Oct 2024)
- Aider polyglot
- 28% (for 22 Oct 2024)
- Balrog
- 19.3% (for 22 Oct 2024)
- Cadeval
- 32% (for 22 Oct 2024)
- Dtbench
- 56.7% (for 22 Oct 2024)
- Frontiermath 2025 02 28 private
- 0.3% (for 22 Oct 2024)
- Geobench
- 34% (for 22 Oct 2024)
- Lech mazur writing
- 73.5% (for 22 Oct 2024)
- Math level 5
- 46.4% (for 22 Oct 2024)
- Mmlu
- 74.3% (for 22 Oct 2024)
- Weirdml
- 30.7% (for 22 Oct 2024)
- Otis mock aime 2024 2025
- 4.3% (saturated benchmark: the top models all score near the ceiling) (for 22 Oct 2024)
Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.
API access
How to call it
Call via other with model id `anthropic/claude-3.5-haiku`.
- other ·
anthropic/claude-3.5-haiku
Scores
How Claude 3.5 Haiku scores
Each score comes from the named source and shows when we last confirmed it. A flag means the score needs care.
| Score | Value | Source | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot (best-across-versions) | 28percentAs of 22 Oct 2024 | Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) | |
| Balrog (best-across-versions) | 19.3percentAs of 22 Oct 2024 | Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) | |
| Cadeval (best-across-versions) | 32percentAs of 22 Oct 2024 | Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) | |
| Dtbench (best-across-versions) | 56.7percentAs of 22 Oct 2024 | Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) | |
| Frontiermath 2025 02 28 private (best-across-versions) | 0.3percentAs of 22 Oct 2024 | Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) | |
| Geobench (best-across-versions) | 34percentAs of 22 Oct 2024 | Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) | |
| Gpqa diamond (best-across-versions) | 38.1percentAs of 22 Oct 2024 | Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) | |
| Lech mazur writing (best-across-versions) | 73.5percentAs of 22 Oct 2024 | Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) | |
| Math level 5 (best-across-versions) | 46.4percentAs of 22 Oct 2024 | Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) | |
| Mmlu (best-across-versions) | 74.3percentAs of 22 Oct 2024 | Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) | |
| Otis mock aime 2024 2025 (best-across-versions)Saturated | 4.3percentAs of 22 Oct 2024 | Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) | |
| Weirdml (best-across-versions) | 30.7percentAs of 22 Oct 2024 | Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) |
- Saturated
- Top models score close to the maximum, so this test no longer separates them.
Compare
Compare Claude 3.5 Haiku side by side
Sources
Where this comes from
- Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)Third party
- Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)Third party
- Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)Third party
- Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)Third party
- Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)Third party
- Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)Third party
- Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)Third party
- Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)Third party
- Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)Third party
- Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)Third party
- Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)Third party
- Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)Third party
A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.
Changelog
What changed
No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.
MODEL FIELD GUIDE / SOURCE EVIDENCE
What you can do with Claude 3.5 Haiku.
No longer listed by its catalogue; the facts shown are as last listed. Sources checked 2026-11-07. Hosting routes and app features can differ.
anthropic/claude-3.5-haiku- Tool calling
- Not established
- Structured output
- Not established
- Reasoning controls
- Not established
- Availability
- unknown
- Price basis
- token
- Licence verification
- Check the developer licence; the model name is insufficient
- Context length
- Not established
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not established
- Developer release date
- Not established
- First seen in the catalogue
- Not established
- Listed retirement date
- Not established
- Last listed by its catalogue
- 13 Jul 2026
Not in the models.dev catalogue when checked; last listed 2026-07-13. Retirement is not confirmed by a source.
Inspect the sources and their scope
Source for last listed.
Checked 2026-07-13FROM SPECIFICATIONS TO YOUR WORK
Is this the right model for your job?
Start with a realistic sample. These workflows match the model’s listed capabilities, not a verified result on your task.
What would it cost?
Pick a common job and how many times a month you run it. Token sizes are our assumption for a typical run, shown under the result.
Enter a whole number of runs from 1 to 100,000,000.
Working out the cost...
Token prices only. Per-request, image, tool, storage and subscription fees are not included. One token is about three quarters of an English word. Real counts vary by model and language. How tokens are counted ↗
Check the source
Price date: 13 Jul 2026, from the models.dev listing. Prices are USD API token rates. Your app subscription, uploads, browsing and tools are separate.
Model source & availability ↗Understand the evidence
Listed capabilities and third-party benchmark scores do not establish Enterprise DNA task-test results. Validate accuracy and total cost on your own sample.
Intelligence Index: 12.3 (2026-07-21) ↗Coding Index: 15.9 (2026-07-21) ↗Agentic Index: 1.9 (2026-07-21) ↗Get the free Developer’s Field Guide
A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.
Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.