Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Skills

Better README

by tommy0103

Audit and rewrite a README so readers can judge fit fast, using the Art of README principles.

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed Better README yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About Better README

A skill for reviewing, improving or translating a project README. It applies a reader funnel: name, one-liner, runnable usage, install, API, caveats, contributing and licence, so the most decision-relevant facts come first. It moves maintainer-only content out, checks links and claims, and keeps an archived copy of the Art of README reference.

Best for

Open-source maintainers and developer tool teams

Use cases

  • Rewrite an open-source README before a launch
  • Check whether a README answers what a new user needs in 30 seconds
  • Translate a README idiomatically, not word for word

Notes

Why it matters

A README decides in seconds whether someone tries your project. This skill treats it as a funnel and fixes the order, which is where most READMEs go wrong.

Source

  • Skill file: skills/better-readme/SKILL.md in tommy0103/better-readme-skill.
  • Repository: 30 GitHub stars, MIT licence. Checked 24 Oct 2026 through the GitHub API.
  • Last change to the skill: 8 Oct 2026.
  • This page was written from the skill's own SKILL.md. It is not an Enterprise DNA source review and the skill has not been installed or tested by us.

Pros

  • Clear structure with reasons behind each rule
  • Verifies links and claims, not just style
  • Keeps the reference material inside the skill

Cons

  • Small repository with few stars so far
  • Opinionated order that may not suit every project

Key facts

What we have checked

Not checked yet. Dated facts such as prices, releases and repository activity appear here once we have confirmed them from a source.

Health and security

Is Better README looked after, and what do its setup files show

Security check static checks

100 out of 100

Reads what is published about the server: package advisories, licence, secrets in the documented setup and tool permissions. Nothing is installed or run, so this is not a security assessment. Checked by edna-skill-static-v1 main@fa3dce198b4b. What it checks

  • Note No dependency list or install command was found in the skill, so there were no packages to look up on OSV.

Alternatives

Alternatives to Better README

RecordTypeHow we knowChecked
technical-writingThis is an alternative to itSkillMatched from the listing text

Compare

Compare Better README side by side

Sources

Where this comes from

No sources recorded yet. Each source we check is listed here with the date we checked it.

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.

Pairs with

Other entries in the index that connect to this one. Click through to see the chain.

Pairs with6 entries
Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.