Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Skills

mass-ulw

by code-yeongyu

OmO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt. Now you are the master of graph engineering.

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed mass-ulw yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About mass-ulw

OmO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt. Now you are the master of graph engineering.

Best for

Developers building complex agent workflows who want a quick, prompt-driven way to manage graphs.

Use cases

  • Automating graph-based workflow creation from natural language prompts
  • Simplifying multi-step process orchestration in agent environments
  • Rapidly prototyping and iterating on graph structures

Notes

70,799 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-11-09.

Indexed from github-skill-repos. Verified against the live GitHub repo.

Pros

  • Simple keyword-based invocation reduces setup friction
  • Leverages TypeScript for robust and maintainable code
  • Backed by a large community with 70k+ stars

Cons

  • Requires the Oh My OpenAgent framework to function
  • Limited to graph engineering tasks, not general-purpose automation
  • Documentation and examples may be sparse given its niche scope

Key facts

What we have checked

Days since the last commit
0
Checked GitHub
GitHub forks
5,841
Checked GitHub
GitHub stars
70,759
Checked GitHub
Days to a first reply on issues
0
Checked GitHub
Open issues
1,623
Checked GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days
100
Checked GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Stars and usage

How mass-ulw is growing

GitHub stars

70,570 to 70,759

stars. 1 Nov 2026 to 7 Nov 2026, 2 readings.

Source: GitHub. Checked .

Health and security

Is mass-ulw looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

75 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked . How it is worked out

PartPointsWhat we saw
Recent activity30 of 30Last push 0 days ago
Releases15 of 15100 releases in 90 days
Issue repliesNot countedThe latest check has no issue response reading (fewer than 3 measured issues, or issues switched off)
Maintainer0 of 15Owned by a single user
Official sourceNot countedMCP servers only

Security check static checks

100 out of 100

Reads what is published about the server: package advisories, licence, secrets in the documented setup and tool permissions. Nothing is installed or run, so this is not a security assessment. Checked by edna-skill-static-v1 dev@7d8dc2b98a57. What it checks

  • Note No dependency list or install command was found in the skill, so there were no packages to look up on OSV.

Sources

Where this comes from

  • GitHubRegistry

    Checked · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Days to a first reply on issues, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.

Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.