Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA

Skills

wf

by tomsej

Extensions, skills, and themes for Pi coding agent

Our verdict

Not reviewed yet

We have not reviewed wf yet

No one at Enterprise DNA has checked this listing against its sources. The description comes from public listings gathered automatically. Any fact below shows where it came from and when it was last checked.

How we review records

From the listing

About wf

wf is a collection of extensions, skills, and themes for the Pi coding agent, written in TypeScript. It provides workflow automation capabilities that can be integrated into Pi-based development environments.

Best for

Developers using the Pi coding agent who want to extend its capabilities with custom workflows and themes.

Use cases

  • Automate repetitive coding tasks within Pi agent workflows
  • Enhance Pi agent with custom skills for specific development processes
  • Apply themes to customize the Pi agent's interface or output

Notes

80 stars on GitHub. Last updated 2026-09-03. Licensed MIT.

Pros

  • Lightweight and focused on extending Pi agent functionality
  • Open source with a public repository for community contributions
  • Combines extensions, skills, and themes in one package

Cons

  • Limited documentation and community adoption (80 stars)
  • Niche use case, only relevant for Pi coding agent users
  • No clear versioning or release information provided

Key facts

What we have checked

Days since the last commit
64
Checked GitHub
GitHub forks
8
Checked GitHub
GitHub stars
80
Checked GitHub
Days to a first reply on issues
172.2
Checked GitHub
Open issues
3
Checked GitHub
Releases in the last 90 days
0
Checked GitHub

Each value shows when we last confirmed it and where it came from. Values we have not confirmed are left out, never guessed.

Stars and usage

How wf is growing

GitHub stars

79 to 80

stars. 1 Nov 2026 to 7 Nov 2026, 2 readings.

Source: GitHub. Checked .

Health and security

Is wf looked after, and what do its setup files show

Health score

34 out of 100

Does someone look after this repository? It does not say the code is good or safe. Worked out from GitHub signals checked . How it is worked out

PartPointsWhat we saw
Recent activity27 of 30Last push 64 days ago
Releases0 of 150 releases in 90 days
Issue replies0 of 20First reply in 172.2 days (median)
Maintainer0 of 15Owned by a single user
Official sourceNot countedMCP servers only

Security check static checks

100 out of 100

Reads what is published about the server: package advisories, licence, secrets in the documented setup and tool permissions. Nothing is installed or run, so this is not a security assessment. Checked by edna-skill-static-v1 main@e132c44b3b06. What it checks

  • Note No dependency list or install command was found in the skill, so there were no packages to look up on OSV.

Alternatives

Alternatives to wf

RecordTypeHow we knowChecked
WorkflowThis is an alternative to itMCP serverMatched from the listing text

Compare

Compare wf side by side

Sources

Where this comes from

  • GitHubRegistry

    Checked · Days since the last commit, GitHub forks, GitHub stars, Days to a first reply on issues, Open issues, Releases in the last 90 days

A source shows what was published when we checked it. It does not certify security, performance or a working installation. Read our method.

Changelog

What changed

No changes recorded yet. Releases, price changes and deprecations appear here, with their dates, once we track them for this record.

Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.