Enterprise DNAEnterprise DNA
LModelsBest coding
Meta logo

Llama 4 Maverick

by Meta

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active

L4

Models

Llama 4 Maverick

Added 10 July 2026

#meta-llama

Overview

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward...

Best for

Best for
Teams that want open-weight flexibility with hosted convenience

Use cases

  • self-host experiments
  • cost-controlled apps
  • fine-tune pipelines

How to use / API access

Call via OpenRouter with model id `meta-llama/llama-4-maverick`.

  • openrouter · meta-llama/llama-4-maverick Docs

OpenRouter id: meta-llama/llama-4-maverick

Benchmarks

  • Intelligence Index (artificial-analysis): 9.3 index
  • Coding Index (artificial-analysis): 16.3 index
  • Agentic Index (artificial-analysis): 0.6 index
  • Design Arena 3d (other): 901 elo · #120
  • Design Arena codecategories (other): 881 elo · #133
  • Design Arena dataviz (other): 882 elo · #128
  • Design Arena gamedev (other): 839 elo · #135

Enterprise DNA angle

EDNA helps teams decide when open weights belong in Omni vs when a closed frontier model is cheaper in total cost of quality.

Notes

Llama 4 Maverick is listed in the EDNA Models directory from the OpenRouter catalogue.

Pros

  • Open-weights family economics
  • Strong community and self-host path

Cons

  • Hosted quality depends on the OpenRouter endpoint
  • May trail closed frontier models on hardest tasks
Free 27-page guide

Get the free Developer’s Field Guide

A 27-page field guide to the AI coding workflow with Claude. Claude Code, MCP servers, the prompt patterns that work, and what to delegate. Free.

Enter your work email. We send it straight over, plus a few short notes worth knowing. Unsubscribe any time.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

USAGE / OPENROUTER

How much Llama 4 Maverick is used

Tokens processed through OpenRouter each day. It shows what developers actually run, not every company's private traffic.

Tokens, last 7 days
17.7B ▲11.1%
Requests, last 7 days
7.8M
Tool calls, last 7 days
141K
Intelligence score
9.3
Average cost per request
6.0¢
Price per million tokens
$0.188 in · $0.652 out
02.5B5B19 Sept: 2.7B tokens, 1.3M requests20 Sept: 2.1B tokens, 995K requests21 Sept: 2.1B tokens, 985K requests22 Sept: 3.1B tokens, 1.7M requests23 Sept: 2.3B tokens, 1.1M requests24 Sept: 2B tokens, 906K requests25 Sept: 2.2B tokens, 1.4M requests26 Sept: 2.3B tokens, 1.1M requests27 Sept: 2B tokens, 789K requests28 Sept: 1.9B tokens, 854K requests29 Sept: 2B tokens, 1.1M requests30 Sept: 2.1B tokens, 1.1M requests1 Oct: 2.2B tokens, 1.1M requests2 Oct: 2.1B tokens, 964K requests3 Oct: 1.7B tokens, 779K requests4 Oct: 2.2B tokens, 916K requests5 Oct: 1.8B tokens, 866K requests6 Oct: 1.8B tokens, 1.1M requests7 Oct: 2.6B tokens, 1.5M requests8 Oct: 2.6B tokens, 1.3M requests9 Oct: 2.9B tokens, 1.7M requests10 Oct: 2.3B tokens, 974K requests11 Oct: 1.9B tokens, 985K requests12 Oct: 2.5B tokens, 1.4M requests13 Oct: 2.5B tokens, 1.3M requests14 Oct: 2.7B tokens, 1.2M requests15 Oct: 2.6B tokens, 1.2M requests16 Oct: 2.4B tokens, 917K requests17 Oct: 2.5B tokens, 834K requests18 Oct: 2.4B tokens, 944K requests19 Sept3 Oct17 Oct18 OctSee where it ranks on the leaderboard →

FROM SPECIFICATIONS TO YOUR WORK

Is this the right model for your job?

Start with a realistic sample. These workflows match the model’s listed capabilities, not a verified result on your task.

Check the source

Price date: 2026-10-18. Prices are USD API token rates. Your app subscription, uploads, browsing and tools are separate.

Model source & availability ↗

Understand the evidence

Listed capabilities and third-party benchmark scores do not establish Enterprise DNA task-test results. Validate accuracy and total cost on your own sample.

Intelligence Index: 9.3 (2026-10-18) ↗Coding Index: 16.3 (2026-10-18) ↗Agentic Index: 0.6 (2026-10-18) ↗
Compare this model with alternatives →